Home > Uncategorized > Odessa revisited

Odessa revisited

Pattern: Odessa from MagKnits.
Materials: Misti Alpaca suri silk on #4 needles

Odessa the second Odessa the second
The second revision of Odessa, after the first one I started came out too short. This one is at least a half-inch longer in the body, and has two plain rows between the first three rows of decreases for a gentler curve. The sl1, k2tog, psso section was modified into sl1, k2togtbl, psso. It looked a little better than the first version, although I’m still not thrilled with how neat they turned out. That’s me, though, not the pattern.
Odessa the second, rear view Odessa the second, rear view
The spiralling looks good. You can also see it’s a little jerky, though, where the decrease rounds are. Also, it was difficult to work those final rows of ssk.
Odessa on my noggin Odessa on my noggin
Longer than the first one, this one would cover my ears if I pulled it down a bit. Hopefully that’ll be good for someone with no hair to get in the way. And speaking of hair, I need a haircut BADLY. The trademark wings I get when the bangs go too long are threatening to send me airborne.

This was knitted from one and a tenth balls of Misti Alpaca suri silk in ruby on #4 needles. The ball band of the yarn doesn’t have a recommended needle size. But no way is this “worsted” as the label says it is. DK, maybe. On the up side? Softest. Yarn. Ever.

I ran out of the first ball about five rows from the end. Had I simply omitted one of the extra rounds, one ball would have sufficed. The ssk decreases called for in the pattern were modified to slip 1 knitwise, slip 1 purlwise, knit two together. It made a neater edge. See below for example.


Old Odessa, worked on #6 needles with a decrease of SSK (both slipped knitwise).


New Odessa, worked on #4 needles wih a decrease of “improved” SSK (first slipped knitwise, second slipped purlwise).

Naturally smaller needles accounts for some of the change, but I can still tell a difference in technique.

This was a fun pattern, and I’d do it again with beads for myself. I’ve even got some Aurora Karabella 8 that would work, with bigger needles and fewer repeats.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: ,
  1. March 8th, 2006 at 12:19 | #1

    Wow, that’s a really cute hat.

  2. March 8th, 2006 at 12:19 | #2

    Wow, that’s a really cute hat.

  3. March 8th, 2006 at 13:04 | #3

    Why did you switch to this improved SSK? My SSKs are stinky and loose, so do you think this might help?

    My husband and I are getting haircuts tonight. For me it’s not “wet dog” stage yet, but OMG my husband has gone past hockey hair. I hope he’ll get something drastic and not his usual pre-mullet.

  4. March 8th, 2006 at 13:04 | #4

    Why did you switch to this improved SSK? My SSKs are stinky and loose, so do you think this might help?

    My husband and I are getting haircuts tonight. For me it’s not “wet dog” stage yet, but OMG my husband has gone past hockey hair. I hope he’ll get something drastic and not his usual pre-mullet.

  5. March 8th, 2006 at 13:30 | #5

    I switched because my SSKs were stinky and loose too. I think I’m actually lucky that the first try on #6 needles didn’t come out well, since it gave me the opportunity to try something different. I looked at this illustration from knittinghelp.com and decided to give it a go. It didn’t look that different on that site, but it sure looked better in my knitting. The stitch underneath the top, left-leaning stitch did lay flatter, which means that the whole thing looked smoother.

  6. March 8th, 2006 at 13:30 | #6

    I switched because my SSKs were stinky and loose too. I think I’m actually lucky that the first try on #6 needles didn’t come out well, since it gave me the opportunity to try something different. I looked at this illustration from knittinghelp.com and decided to give it a go. It didn’t look that different on that site, but it sure looked better in my knitting. The stitch underneath the top, left-leaning stitch did lay flatter, which means that the whole thing looked smoother.

  7. March 8th, 2006 at 13:31 | #7

    Thanks!

  8. March 8th, 2006 at 13:31 | #8

    Thanks!

  9. March 8th, 2006 at 13:49 | #9

    She’s gonna LOVE it.

  10. March 8th, 2006 at 13:49 | #10

    She’s gonna LOVE it.

  11. March 8th, 2006 at 14:14 | #11

    Wow, I love the way it turned out! I like the beaded version, but I had been waiting to see a non-beaded version to see if I liked it as much, since I am not sure I feel like dealing with beads, and I love it! The color is gorgeous!

  12. March 8th, 2006 at 14:14 | #12

    Wow, I love the way it turned out! I like the beaded version, but I had been waiting to see a non-beaded version to see if I liked it as much, since I am not sure I feel like dealing with beads, and I love it! The color is gorgeous!

  13. March 8th, 2006 at 14:21 | #13

    I’ll have to check when I get home, but I’m thinking that it’s my top stitch that is loose. Of course, up until a couple months ago I was passing them both purlwise…

    Maybe I’ll try your method and its opposite.

  14. March 8th, 2006 at 14:21 | #14

    I’ll have to check when I get home, but I’m thinking that it’s my top stitch that is loose. Of course, up until a couple months ago I was passing them both purlwise…

    Maybe I’ll try your method and its opposite.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.